1·Unverified
सर्वोच्च अदालतले १३ जेठको फैसलामा शैलुङ ४१ विरुद्ध शैलुङ ३२ को मुद्दामा यस्तो व्याख्या गरेको हो।
Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
The fact-check findings indicate that while some claims regarding the Supreme Court's interpretation and decisions in a sexual assault case are confirmed true, several other claims remain unverified due to a lack of credible evidence. Specifically, the court's ruling on the sentencing of the accused and the importance of the victim's testimony are supported by moderate evidence from multiple sources. However, claims related to the ages of the individuals involved and other court decisions lack sufficient relevant sources to validate them.
Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
Confirmed true by 1 relevant sources (evidence strength: 59%).
“सैलुङ ४१ को उमेर १६ वर्ष ११ महिना रहेको देखिएकोले बालबालिकासम्बन्धी ऐन, २०७५ अनुसार ३ वर्ष कैद र २० हजार क्षतिपूर्ति भराउने सर्वोच्चले फैसला गरेको छ”Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
Confirmed true by 2 relevant sources (evidence strength: 73%).
“सर्वोच्च अदालतले जबरजस्ती करणीको मुद्दामा पीडितको कथन महत्वपूर्ण प्रमाण हुने भए पनि उक्त कथनको अन्य प्रमाणहरूसँगको साजमञ्जस्यलाई सँगसँगै परीक्षण गरिनुपर्ने व्याख्या गरेको छ”“जबराज़स्ती करणी मुद्दामा पीडितको भनाइ र जाहेरीले सर्वाधिक महत्त्व राख्ने ।”The fact-check findings indicate that while some claims regarding the Supreme Court's interpretation and decisions in a sexual assault case are confirmed true, several other claims remain unverified due to a lack of credible evidence. Specifically, the court's ruling on the sentencing of the accused and the importance of the victim's testimony are supported by moderate evidence from multiple sources. However, claims related to the ages of the individuals involved and other court decisions lack sufficient relevant sources to validate them.
Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
Confirmed true by 1 relevant sources (evidence strength: 59%).
“सैलुङ ४१ को उमेर १६ वर्ष ११ महिना रहेको देखिएकोले बालबालिकासम्बन्धी ऐन, २०७५ अनुसार ३ वर्ष कैद र २० हजार क्षतिपूर्ति भराउने सर्वोच्चले फैसला गरेको छ”Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
Unverified — only 0 relevant source(s) found.
Confirmed true by 2 relevant sources (evidence strength: 73%).
“सर्वोच्च अदालतले जबरजस्ती करणीको मुद्दामा पीडितको कथन महत्वपूर्ण प्रमाण हुने भए पनि उक्त कथनको अन्य प्रमाणहरूसँगको साजमञ्जस्यलाई सँगसँगै परीक्षण गरिनुपर्ने व्याख्या गरेको छ”“जबराज़स्ती करणी मुद्दामा पीडितको भनाइ र जाहेरीले सर्वाधिक महत्त्व राख्ने ।”